hes being controversial, to make everyone think hes edgy.

Besides what kind of person bases what they do on other peoples reviews. its a guide not instructions

Some people are idiots hey.


I can understand if a reviewer gives a bad review, but the one reason he gave isn't even valid. He needs to get out more.

i loved your books and it had plenty of luster ive read these books like 1123426487687 times each
this is what i said to that tool




Because - hot chicks: they do not act like this in real life.

no shit Sherlock this book isn't real life!

ill quote you again

you people never get old. all you do is bitch about how bad a book is saying lacks luster or that its dialogue was terrible. i think people like you have a serious problem why do you feel that you must insult everything to make your own insignificant life bearable. maybe you didn't enjoy it so what no one forced you to read it. i have bought books i didn't like i normally just stop reading it and guess what i have never felt that i needed to go insult the book and or the writer or go as far as to make assumptions into his/her sex life. ill leave off here saying notice how many people didnt like this article.

p.s. the point in the book you're referring to is around chapter 4 out of what like 32 maybe try reading a little further you might be surprised the first chapters of any book are hardly ever any good id be surprised if you've finished more then a few

good luck your life




i hope you dont disaprove of any of this tom
oh and question where you malevolence?

nicely said :)

he couldn't finish the book and yet wrote a review.
I shall do the same, i couldn't be bothered to read his review all the way through.
Here's my review of his review.....(drum roll)

He's a twat that can't discern the difference between fantasy stories and reality.

bump